Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Stock Photo News
    • Shutterstock Launches The Create Fund for Artists to Produce Current Content
    • Dreamstime Raises Royalty Rates by 10% to Aid Artists During Covid19 Pandemic
    • Shutterstock Updates Contributors Royalty Rates – New Download-Based Levels
    • Shutterstock’s Contributor Earnings Report is Out: $1 Billion in Royalties Paid!
    • Creating Stock Video vs Photos: 5 Reasons Why It’s Easier Than You Think (Including Higher Royalties)
    • Shutterstock Contributor App Now Enables Mobile Sign-Up
    • How to Use Google Trends to Identify Profitable Stock Photo Trends
    • How Much Photographers Earn: Jim Pickerell’s Survey Results are Here
    My Stock Photo
    • Home
    • News
    • Guides
      • Webinars
    • Stock Agencies
      • Microstock Agencies
    • Tools & Software
    • Photography
    • Stories
      • Interviews
    • Mobile Stock
    • Contact
      • About
      • Privacy Policy
    My Stock Photo
    You are at:Home»Microstock News»Is microstock the antithesis of a fair trade photography?

    Is microstock the antithesis of a fair trade photography?

    3
    By Amos Struck on December 1, 2009 Microstock News

    low price tag
    © Feng Yu – Fotolia.com

    —

    –

    Is microstock the antithesis of a fair trade photography? An opposite opinion.

    Microstock is giving the opportunity to a large amount of amateur and hobbyist photographers to enter in the photographic market. The user content generated concept of the beginning is still present but microstock has become a well established industry and in the last period we are observing a lot of pro photographers that are joining the arena. Someone is doing a good money, someone else is very happy about an extra earning that let him to buy, for example, a new gear or lens.

    My position is that, as an amateur photographer, I'd hardly be able to enter in a traditional stock photo circuit. Also consider that some smart and valid photographers could gain the access of a more prestigious market, such as the Vetta Collection for iStockers or the potential to move from micro to premium collections for Moodboard contributors. We also write about the advantages of microstock but it's not all a bed of roses. I understand the position of many photographers that never will sell their pictures for some pennies and think that microstock is playing down the photographic market. I've found a page of PhotographersDirect to be very representative of this opposite approach.

    PhotographersDirect is a photographic portal to help picture buyers and researchers find suitable stock photos for any media and they have pioneered the concept of “Fair Trade Stock Photography” (photographers receive 80% of the sale price of their images). In the page “Why will Photographers Direct not represent photographers who have images on microstock / micropayment sites?“, they explain the opposition to this kind of market.

    Here some focal quotes:

    The only people who benefit from these (microstock, ndr) sites are:

    1. The site owners, because they make money from the images and do not care about the damage they are doing to professional photographers' livelihoods.

    2. The buyers, who cannot believe their luck at being able to get images for a few dollars, and being able to use them as often as they like, for as long as they like, wherever they like.

    The people who lose out every time are the photographers

    Imagine the day when you see one of your images on a book or magazine cover. You will probably be very happy and proud, until you realize you earned less than a dollar from an image that is helping to generate possibly hundreds of thousands of dollars in publishing sales. Is this fair?

    Can IBM afford to pay market rates for images? Of course! Would they pay 500 dollars for this same image if that was the price? The odds are they would. So why did they pay 1 dollar? Because that was the price

    “What I would like particular emphasis on (because it is often overlooked)“ – said Chris Barton Director at PhotographersDirect  – “is that we do not have a problem with microstock per se – we agree that it has opened up a whole new market of ‘micro-buyers' who just want low cost images for their personal blogs, small business websites, etc.  The problem with microstock is the completely open RF license which allows images bought for a few dollars to be used for anything – even the cover of Time Magazine.”

    Full page available at http://www.photographersdirect.com/sellers/microstock_sites.asp

    Just published a related topic post by FastMediaMagazine, Is microstock really killing markets?

    Debate is open…

    Related posts:

    iStockphoto Celebrates 10th Anniversary
    Corepics Pro microstock business model
    Shutterstock Image Library Hits 10 Million Images
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Amos Struck
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn

    I write about the stock photo and microstock industry since 2006 on my several online-magazines. My goal for MyStockPhoto is to teach photographers and stock photographers how to sell more photos and earn money with their photography hobby.

    Related Posts

    Shutterstock Launches The Create Fund for Artists to Produce Current Content

    Dreamstime Raises Royalty Rates by 10% to Aid Artists During Covid19 Pandemic

    Shutterstock Updates Contributors Royalty Rates – New Download-Based Levels

    3 Comments

    1. IanMurray on December 3, 2009 11:23 am

      There is nothing stopping you or anybody else submitting and selling on Alamy

      Reply
    2. andyla123 on July 21, 2010 12:06 pm

      I really agree that most of the time this things happen, the photographers must be really recognized and given copyright terms if they use their photos.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Recent Posts
    December 11, 2020

    Shutterstock Launches The Create Fund for Artists to Produce Current Content

    June 1, 2020

    Dreamstime Raises Royalty Rates by 10% to Aid Artists During Covid19 Pandemic

    May 26, 2020

    Shutterstock Updates Contributors Royalty Rates – New Download-Based Levels

    December 10, 2019

    Shutterstock’s Contributor Earnings Report is Out: $1 Billion in Royalties Paid!

    April 11, 2019

    Creating Stock Video vs Photos: 5 Reasons Why It’s Easier Than You Think (Including Higher Royalties)

    Want to learn how the Pros sell their photos online?

    Signup for our weekly free newsletter!Click Here to get Free Help!
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Top Reviews
    December 11, 2020

    Shutterstock Launches The Create Fund for Artists to Produce Current Content

    June 1, 2020

    Dreamstime Raises Royalty Rates by 10% to Aid Artists During Covid19 Pandemic

    May 26, 2020

    Shutterstock Updates Contributors Royalty Rates – New Download-Based Levels

    December 10, 2019

    Shutterstock’s Contributor Earnings Report is Out: $1 Billion in Royalties Paid!

    November 3, 2018

    How to Earn $500/Month with Stock Photography

    7.3
    May 25, 2009

    Dreamstime review

    July 21, 2017

    The Brutally Honest Guide to Microstock Photography – Review + Free Giveaway!

    September 10, 2009

    Fotolia’s top selling contributors

    9.0
    December 9, 2014

    StockPerformer Review – the ultimative stock photography analysis platform

    8.0
    May 23, 2014

    Book Review: Robert Kneschke – Stock Photography (Win a copy!)

    7.5
    May 8, 2014

    Meet Stockhub – a new Microstock Analytics Tool (In Beta)

    7.3
    May 25, 2009

    Dreamstime review

    © 2023 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.